返信投稿

  rff*m@gmail.com
  toms shoes    9/24(木) 02:35:11 No.20150924023511

It is clear from the proceedings of the Commission and arguments made by the legal team headed by Abdul Hafeez Pirzada that the PTI wanted a decision on the basis of inspection of polling bags, which according to it, were opened in some cases without realizing how a decision on fairness of elections can be given merely on the basis of opened bags when there is no specific complaint of large scale rigging on polling or even afterwards with clear description as to how any rigging took place or rigging plan was executed. If this principle is accepted, anyone will demand undoing of whole election process and sacking of the democratically elected government merely by managing to open or tamper some of the polling bags months after election even if there was no compliant of rigging on election day and overall process of casting of votes and counting was fair and transparent.

名前
パスワード
コメント
   


| もどる |