ideoplede www.footballpatriotsstore.com/new-arrival-chandler-jones-patriots-jersey-c-9_28.html
poepaictabisa www.footballpatriotsstore.com/new-arrival-kyle-arrington-patriots-jersey-c-9_30.html
Rakunjunseden www.shoppackersnfljersey.com/new-arrival-tom-crabtree-packers-jersey-c-9_51.html
- sevmqqyo 5/3(金) 07:37:58
DLCV75 <a href="http://gpfurkhnootj.com/">gpfurkhnootj</a>, [url=http://gsomhfzsjpfq.com/]gsomhfzsjpfq[/url], [link=http://vozkhqeggdjd.com/]vozkhqeggdjd[/link], http://kxkxlzdilbrt.com/
- Prasad 2/17(月) 18:35:25
Yeah, the Colts/Pats game was pretty great to watch, toughh I'm not sure which amazes me more, the ballsy, yet stupid, decision to go for it on 4th down instead of punting or the pretty questionable and somehow not reviewed call of "bobbling the catch" that resulted in the lack of a first down... In any case, great play by the Colts and fantastic football for anyone who enjoys watching it for the excitement.
- Carmen 2/18(火) 08:25:14
some nice work TMG, although I do feel you <a href="http://cqozifhnqb.com">sevelery</a> under-rated some key guys on a few teams, examples1. Shaun Phillips a 2? The guy is a key component and sack master on San Diego's D2. Roethlisberger a 3? I guess a Super Bowl doesn't warrant a 43. Randel El a 2? No way! He has thrived as a return man and is now a dangerous receiving threat, 3 minimum.4. Marion Butler a 2? the guy scores 10 TD a year.5. Al Johnson a 2? He has been a starting center for two teams and is at least a 3.6. Many disagreements with Pats picks, notably their phenomenal O linemen Kaczur and Mankins. Those guys kep Brady clean and they maul opposing D lines. Not sexy, but super players. Value of 4 to their team, but no Pat stands out as they're all an amorphous ball of team. Ditto David Thomas and Ty Warren. Both excel and add a ton of value to that team.The Birds also heavily benefit from 3 players who ranked 3 or higher but make their plays elsewhere. Burgess is a 4 and has become a superstar post-Birds. Raheem Brock got cut and never played a snap only to be a solid DT in Indy. Lewis had some good years here but does his non covering elsewhere now. Not even sure I'd call him a 3. My point in this is that the Birds seem to lose key guys drafted (probably because they believe in their ability to draft and also because they are cheap) who do shine in the long run...elsewhere.Also, look how many horrid drafts the Birds have had. 2001, 2003, 2005, 2006 (thus far but I still like that year). Aside from Dallas, no one seems to have had as many "only 1 useful player" drafts. 2003 and 2004 were absolutely terrible years. They are paying for that now with no depth and 3rd to 4th year guys ready to step in and excel.I still stand by the notion that the Birds do not draft as consistently as other teams. I feel that 2002 is really carrying them as that was an excellent year with severl superstars and they have thrown a ton of stinkers in too. I do think 2005 and 2006 could be strong in the long run, perhaps 2002 level. 2007 looks like anothe rpotential bust, although I am not sure why Abiamiri is deactivated while they tolerate Kearse making 1 tackle. Victor looked stout in pre season on run and pass.Bumble
- Barbara 2/19(水) 22:20:17
Given the number of utfradned FAs that have made the Iggles over the past 8 years, would Reid look better? Or do you think they've only done an average job there? http://turrmsf.com [url=http://hdtfbd.com]hdtfbd[/url] [link=http://aytlgb.com]aytlgb[/link]
|